<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenID Smackdown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therealmccrea.com/2008/03/24/openid-smackdown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therealmccrea.com/2008/03/24/openid-smackdown/</link>
	<description>On the Emergence of the Social Web</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 17:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Identity 2.0 &#187; Big Boys and OpenID</title>
		<link>http://therealmccrea.com/2008/03/24/openid-smackdown/#comment-572</link>
		<dc:creator>Identity 2.0 &#187; Big Boys and OpenID</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therealmccrea.wordpress.com/?p=113#comment-572</guid>
		<description>[...] but are not accepting them. In other words, they are an OpenID Provider, but not a Relying Party.  John McCrea echos what Michael said, and Jason Kolb and David Recordon also wrote posts &#8212; and I agree [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but are not accepting them. In other words, they are an OpenID Provider, but not a Relying Party.  John McCrea echos what Michael said, and Jason Kolb and David Recordon also wrote posts &#8212; and I agree [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
