Can Lifestreaming and Aggregation Go Mainstream?

Once again, Louis Gray has spun up a good conversation in the blogosphere, this time with a post focused on the magic of getting services that aggregate lifestreams to catch on as activity centers. Mashable’s Mark “Rizzn” Hopkins joins the fray, pointing out that at this stage, these services seem to fare much better with the early adopter crowd than with mainstream users.

I think there is an interesting question in all of this, “Can lifestreaming and aggregation go maintstream?” After all, as Alexander van Elsas points out, based on his research, the vast majority of content aggregated by FriendFeed is “tweets” (a word unknown to the vast majority of Internet users at this moment).

I’m pretty confident that aggregation is here to stay, and that the concepts of lifestreaming and aggregation will become core elements of the mainstream Web experience. But, for that to happen, we will need to see quite a number of pain points addressed, something I’ve written about recently.

Right now, there’s way to much friction in the Social Web. Each site I join asks me to create a username/password pair, enter my profile data, import my address book, and manually stitch together (again) my local piece of the “social graph.” And each aggregator asks me to tell it all the services I use (my blog URL, my Twitter username, where I share photos, etc.).

Missing from the picture is what I call a services layer for the Social Web, which wraps up a bunch of cool and important technologies, including OpenID, Oath, microformats, Social Graph API, and the OpenSocial stuff, into three basic utilities:

Emerging service layer for the Social Web

The result will be a virutous cycle of social discovery of new sites through seemless interoperability with the aggregator services. This won’t happen overnight, but it is what we’re totally focused on at Plaxo, and it’s a really exciting opportunity. Thanks to Joseph Smarr at Plaxo for these slides from his recent talk at Web 2.0 Expo.

VirtuousCycle

3 thoughts on “Can Lifestreaming and Aggregation Go Mainstream?

  1. Chris Miller says:

    I talk about the differences in lifestreaming and aggregation in a recent blog posting

    http://thesocialnetworker.com/tsn/tsn.nsf/dx/defining-aggregation-versus-lifestreaming.htm

  2. Kashgar says:

    I like the story you tell…then what is goofy2, you probably have to create a new name for it..

  3. [...] friends, and feeds. As readers of this site know, I couldn’t agree more! Check out our Social Web ecosystem charts in this post, which we developed for Joseph Smarr’s talk at Web 2.0 this year. Possibly [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 28 other followers

%d bloggers like this: